When I did a comparison, there was a difference of 192 bytes starting at position 0x03249D09. When downloading it from the page, it has the correct hash. When downloading it from the page, it results in a file with a different/incorrect hash. Local the checksum for win32/en-US/Firefox Setup 78.3.0esr.exe and compare to the result from the downloaded file.Ĭan anyone else confirm? If it is confirmed, to whom should we report the issue?ĭid both of you download the executable from the "pretty" download page ( ), or did you download it from the releases page?( ).On Windows, you can use certutil -hashfile SHA256 Get the SHA256 checksum of the executable.Click Download Now and save to a folder.Select Firefox Extended Support Release → Windows 32-bit → English (US).Steps to reproduce, as of today with 78.3.0 ESR: I confirmed that it is not a problem with downloading executables on my own machine, because the 68.x ESR series did not exhibit this problem, and the checksums for other downloaded executables are fine. This has been consistent for every version of 78.x ESR that I've tried to test. However, the checksum for the MSI version has been fine. Ever since the 78.x ESR series was released, I noticed the SHA256 checksums published on are not matching for the 32-bit Windows EXE files (en-US).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |